Quality Public Education for All New Jersey Students

 

 
     GSCS Bar Chart: Statewide Special Education cost percent compared to Regular & Other Instructional cost percent 2004-2011
     11-18-10 Proposed Somerset County school for special ed students would include convenience store
     Special Education Series - Asbury Park Press 'Special Care-Unkown Costs'
     GSCS - High costs of Special Education must be addressed asap, & appropriately
     9-23-09 'Tests changing for special ed students'
     7-22-09 'State gives extra aid for schools an extraordinary boost'
     6-26-09 Executive Director to GSCS Trustees; Wrap Up Report - State Budget and Assembly bills this week
     6-24-09 U.S. Supreme Court backs reimbursement for private tuition
     090416 DOE RELEASE - IDEA ALLOCATIONS
     NJ District listing, Title One & IDEA under federal stimulus law
     12-29-08 NJ to new leaders - Fund our schools
     OCT 7 FORUM - DIRECTIONS & PARKING INFO ATTACHED
     OCT 7 FORUM - DIRECTIONS ATTACHED; PARKING FORMS TO BE AVAILABLE HERE SOON!
     GSCS, Special Education Coalition for Funding Reform, and Rutgers Institute co-sponsor Forum Oct 7th
     SAVE THE DATE - OCT. 7TH
     May 29 2008 STATE FUNDING FOR EXTRAORDINARY COST
     GSCS School Funding Paper 'Funding NJ's Schools...Finding a Workable Solution' distributed 10-22-07 at Press Conf in Trenton
     UPDATED - Possible Spec. Educ. Aid Loss to districts (based on current aid per current, yet outdated by 6 years, CEIFA distribution) if state chooses to 'wealth-equalize' this aid in a future formula
     10-23 Media reports & Trenton responses to date re GSCS Press Conf
     Spec. Educ. Aid Loss to districts (based on current aid per current, yet outdated by 6 years, CEIFA distribution) if state chooses to 'wealth-equalize' this aid in a future formula
     11-1-06 Press Conference packet
     9-20-07 New Jersey School Boards Assoc. Releases its Report on Special Education
     7-26-07 Council on Local Mandates reverses DOE spec ed regulation
     6-29-07 Lots of news affecting NJ, its schools and communities this week - STATE BUDGET signed - LIST OF LINE ITEM VETOES - US SUPREME CT RULING impacts school desgregation - SPECIAL EDUCATION GROUPS file suit against state
     Special Education Review Commission Report submitted April 2007
     Special Education - proposed 'burden of proof' legislation, Spec Educ Review Commission Report
     2-15-07 'Parents get boost on special ed rights' Star Ledger
     8-17-06 Special Education costs & Constitutional Questions re Tax Reform
     6-29-06 Mirroring the elements, State Budget looking like a 'natural disaster'
     6-12-06 EMAILNET - Extraordinary Special Education student aid; FY07 Budget 'crunch' is on; news clips
     5-16-06 EMAILNET Action in Trenton
     3-22-06 EMAILNET Governor Corzine's Budget Message
     1-19-06 GSCS member concerns re Proposed Revisions in Special Education Code
     Charts Spec Ed & Health Benefits increases v Local Levy since CEIFA has been frozen
     CHART: Health Benefits & Special Educ v.local levy FY02 to FY06 (pdf)
     2-28-06 Dept of Education Spec Educ Rules
     1-19-06 New Jersey Assoc of School Adminstrators on Sped Educ code revisions
     Proposed State Budget for Fiscal Year 2006 - GSCS Testimony
     Statewide - Special Educ & Total Enrollment Growth Chart 2001-2004[gscs]
     Special Education Enrollments 2003 statewide by DFG
     GSCS Testimony 2003 on Suggestions for School Funding - issues similar to 2005-6
9-23-09 'Tests changing for special ed students'
Phillyburbs.com - The Intelligencer "Special education students generally perform below their biological grade level, officials said. The Pennsylvania Department of Education is changing the way schools test special education students to determine their learning levels, officials said. The modified tests "will be less cognitively complex and shorter" than the regular standardized tests, according to state education officials..."

Phillyburbs.com, 9-16-09

Tests changing for special ed students

By: JOAN HELLYER

The Intelligencer

Special education students generally perform below their biological grade level, officials said.

The Pennsylvania Department of Education is changing the way schools test special education students to determine their learning levels, officials said. The modified tests "will be less cognitively complex and shorter" than the regular standardized tests, according to state education officials.

Schools officials have argued for years that special education students often don't learn at the same rate as mainstream students, and therefore their scores shouldn't be used to determine if a school deserves Adequate Yearly Progress status.

The state uses results from the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment mathematics and reading tests to determine whether schools achieved AYP, as required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act.

Low-performing schools face a variety of corrective actions including eventual takeover by the state if PSSA results do not improve.

Locally, the high schools in the Bensalem, Centennial, Council Rock, Neshaminy and Morrisville school districts received a warning or landed in corrective action status after their special education students did not demonstrate proficiency in at least one of the 2009 exams. In addition, Bensalem's two middle schools and Samuel K. Faust and Benjamin Rush elementary schools did not earn AYP status because of their special education students' performance on the tests.

Once the modified PSSA tests are used beginning in 2010, there will be no limit on the number of special education students who can take the exams in each school. However, only 2 percent of the satisfactory scores from the modified tests will count toward the school's proficiency rating when AYP status is being determined, state education officials said.

The remaining results, regardless of how well the special education students performed, will be factored in with the scores of mainstream students who scored in the below basic range, officials said. Below basic suggests a student is performing below his or her grade level.

Given the limitations on how results from the modified exam will be used, local educators wonder if the changes will really make a difference.

"At this point, it's more of a gesture than a solution," Council Rock Superintendent Mark Klein said. "I don't know if it goes far enough and takes into consideration the significant difficulties the special education students face."

Bristol Township School District officials have similar concerns, spokeswoman Eileen Kelliher said.

"We worry that these tests will only set new standards for failure for a vulnerable population," she said.

Until now, only severely handicapped students have been exempt from taking the PSSA tests, despite the fact that many special education students don't learn at their biological grade level. That fact was illustrated in the recently released 2009 PSSA results in mathematics and reading.

At Bensalem High School, for instance, only 11.9 percent of the 42 special education students who were tested demonstrated proficiency on the PSSA 11th-grade math test. That compares to an overall proficiency rate of 57.3 percent for the 403 Bensalem juniors who took the exam.

The proficiency rate is the number of students who scored proficient or advanced on the standardized tests. Students who score in either of those categories are learning at or above their grade level, officials said.

Council Rock High School North in Newtown Township, for example, had an overall proficiency rate of 69.2 percent for the 553 students who took the 11th-grade math exam. But only 6.4 percent of the 62 CR North special education students who took the PSSA math test demonstrated they're learning at their grade level.

State Education Department officials say they're developing the modified tests to better determine how well special education students learn. They explained the revisions earlier this month prior to the release of the 2009 AYP results.

The modified math test will be used beginning in 2010, said John Weiss, director of the Education Department's assessment and accountability bureau. The reading test will be used starting in 2011.

However, "not every (special education) student will take the modified assessment," Weiss said.

That will be determined when a student, his or her parents and school representatives craft an Individual Education Program for the child. The IEP will spell out whether "the student is qualified to participate in the modified assessment," Weiss said.

To qualify, a student needs accommodations and modifications made to their learning environment, including additional teachers and teaching assistants, to give them a chance to perform at the same level as their peers, PDE officials said. But even with those extra supports, those students must demonstrate "persistent academic difficulties" to qualify for the modified exams.

"On the surface, the (modified PSSA tests) look much better at meeting the needs of that group of students," said Bristol Superintendent Broadus Davis, a former special education teacher. "But its impact is still to be determined."

Joan Hellyer can be reached at 215-949-4048 or jhellyer@phillyBurbs.com.