Quality Public Education for All New Jersey Students

 

 
     Pre 2012 Announcement Archives
     2012-13 Announcement Archives
     2013-14 Announcement Archives
     2014-15 Announcement Archives
     Old Announcements prior April 2009
     ARCHIVE inc 2007 Announcements
     2009 Archives
     2008 Archives
     2007 Archives
     2006 Archives
     2010-11 Announcements
     2005 through Jan 30 2006 Announcements
6-17-11 Education In the News
Njspotlight.com - Pilot Project to Launch Christie's Teacher Evaluation System...Nine districts to test evaluation systems, with conditions

Nj.com - Christie's proposal would give private companies unprecedented control of failing N.J. public schools

Nj.com - Christie's proposal would give private companies unprecedented control of failing N.J. public schools

Published: Friday, June 17, 2011, 7:45 AM

By Jessica Calefati/The Star-LedgerThe Star-Ledger
TRENTON — Private companies may soon gain unprecedented control of five failing New Jersey public schools if a proposal unveiled last week by Gov. Chris Christie is approved by the Legislature.

Fewer than 70 public schools across the country are managed privately and many struggle because of restrictive local regulations and feuds between the companies and the communities they serve, education experts said.

"The track record of public school takeover is ambiguous. Really, none of the companies has had remarkable success," said Rick Hess, director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a think tank.

Christie’s proposal would invite non-profit and for-profit companies to participate in the five-year pilot program. Local school boards selected through an application process would have two options — ask the private company to manage a failed school or authorize the company to launch a new one.

Acting Education Commissioner Christopher Cerf said the governor’s proposed legislation allows for both options because it is much harder to turn around a failed school than it is to start a new school.

"It is notoriously difficult to turn schools around with a change in management," Cerf said. "This is one of the strongest arguments for closure and replacement."

Cerf conceded that many contracts nationwide between school districts and private companies have been canceled in the past two decades, however, he said this does not mean the partnerships were a failure.

"There is a very strong progressive impulse that anything that is for profit or not traditional is suspect," said Cerf, adding that teachers’ unions often oppose the arrangements.

Even mentioning the words "profit" or "business" in the same sentence as "education" or "public school" can yield "radioactive" political results, said Andrew Rotherham, founder of Bellweather Education, a non-profit group that supports low-income students.

"If New Jersey moves forward with this proposal, people should remain aware of all the risks and not expect miracles," Rotherham said. "This is a debate long on ideology and short on empirical proof that it works."

PREVIOUS COVERAGE:


Gov. Christie proposes private firms manage some failing N.J. public schools

Gov. Christie introduces plan allowing for-profit companies to run 5 failing N.J. public schools

Gov. Christie to unveil public-private school partnership plan

In December 2010, the National Education Policy Center found that 47.8 percent of students at schools run by for-profit companies met federal education standards. The figure is lower for students attending schools run by non-profits. Just 22.2 percent of those students met the standards.

The Wichita Public Schools in Kansas is one of dozens of districts across the country that held contracts with school management companies that were later canceled. Edison Schools began doing business with Wichita in 1995, but by 2003, the company lost its contract to run four schools there.

Poor test scores, declining enrollment and high teacher turnover were among the concerns that led the Wichita school board to cancel the contracts, said Susan Arensman, a spokesperson for the district. The move saved the district half a million dollars, she said.

"We were not seeing from Edison what we were promised," Arensman said. "The couple of schools they controlled were producing the same results as our other schools. Some of our schools were actually doing better."

John Chubb, a fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, said school management companies can only succeed when given the latitude to implement their models — something that doesn’t happen often because of the fervor takeovers stir among skeptical teachers and parents.

Chubb helped found Edison Schools, now known as EdisonLearning, in the early 1990s. He saw the for-profit company through its boom when it ran 150 schools to its bust. Today, Edison manages four public schools.

"If for-profit entities like Edison operate in an environment where they are free to do what needs to be done for them to be successful, you will see results," Chubb said. "If they are compromised, the results will be mixed."

The Knowledge is Power Program (KIPP) ran into similar troubles in 2005, when it tried to take over the Cole Middle School in Denver.

KIPP is well known for its success running high-performing charter schools in urban areas, but even it could not turn around Cole, a public school, said Gary Miron, an education professor at Western Michigan University who helped author the National Education Policy Center reports.

Part of the problem, Miron said, was that in the takeover, KIPP had to let students enroll at any time during the school year, unlike their charter schools where students can only come at the start of the year.

"Students leaving and students coming mid-year is disruptive," Miron said. "KIPP allowed it there because they had to, and the experiment failed. KIPP no longer takes over schools for that reason."

Even if Christie can push his school transformation proposal through the Legislature, his gubernatorial successor could undue his work a few years from now.

"New Jersey will have to convince providers in demand that this state is a place they should want to come do business," said Hess, of the American Enterprise Institute. "They will want to feel they have a real chance to succeed here, that this new law won’t be reversed and the ground yanked out from under them."

 

 

Njspotlight.com - Pilot Project to Launch Christie's Teacher Evaluation System

Nine districts to test evaluation systems, with conditions

By John Mooney, June 17 in Education|Post a Comment

The Christie administration’s vaunted plans to remake teacher evaluation in New Jersey will start with up to nine pilot districts testing various methods next year, with a little money and lots of guidance from the state.

Related Links

The state Department of Education (DOE) yesterday sent out invitations to districts to apply to be pilots for development of a statewide evaluation system that will be called Excellent Educators for NJ (EE4NJ).

The new system is the centerpiece of Gov. Chris Christie's broader agenda for teacher tenure and pay reforms, and its development in a few districts next year had been expected. It is slated to go statewide the year after.

Still, many of the details are new, outlined in lengthy summaries and grant applications that lay out a few of the central tenets of the system.

"We view this pilot as an excellent opportunity for the state to collaborate with educators, district leaders, and other stakeholders and jointly design a statewide framework," acting Education Commissioner Chris Cerf said in a letter to districts yesterday.

The department will seek a cross-section of districts, both geographically and socio-economically. And some money will be provided to districts to put the systems in place, a total of $1.1 million.

The money will be used for internal expenses and training, as well as for hiring an outside evaluator, who will track data from the system, and evaluation "providers" to assist in the implementation.

As expected, the evaluations will have to consider equally both student achievement and teacher practice, the most controversial part of the plan. Much of the plan is drawn from a task force appointed by Christie that laid out the general principles of a new system.

But going into greater detail, the proposal calls for all teachers in participating districts and schools be required to be part of the system, including those in subjects and grades that do not have standardized tests. For those without tests, there will be several models for evaluating student achievement and progress.

Still, the state will not require the districts to use the evaluations in personnel decisions, at least not yet. "It is left to participating districts to determine how they will use pilot evaluation results," read the guidelines.

The districts will be required to use a "a high-quality, research-based framework for evaluating teacher practice," with a half-dozen specific programs suggested. Teacher training will be required to familiarize them with the new rules.

And there will be plenty of those, including specific numbers and duration of classroom evaluations for different levels of teachers, and processes for those evaluations.

One part of the planned evaluations left out of the pilot will be that of school principals. The guidelines said that a similar program will be tried in subsequent years, but the state wanted to start with teachers.

"We have much to learn from the pilot process and believe we are best served by taking it one step at a time," read the guidelines. "Principals in teacher evaluation pilot districts will play an active role in providing feedback for the new system."

"This will help them better understand and inform teacher evaluations, the results of which will form a large part of principal evaluations in the future."