Quality Public Education for All New Jersey Students

 

 
     Pre 2012 Announcement Archives
     2012-13 Announcement Archives
     2013-14 Announcement Archives
     2014-15 Announcement Archives
     Old Announcements prior April 2009
     ARCHIVE inc 2007 Announcements
     2009 Archives
     2008 Archives
     2007 Archives
     2006 Archives
     2010-11 Announcements
     2005 through Jan 30 2006 Announcements
12-14-06 Trenton News articles

Corzine puts conditions on tax credit

Governor insists on comptroller's office and 4% cap on future property levy increases

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

BY DUNSTAN McNICHOL AND TOM HESTER

Star-Ledger Staff

Gov. Jon Corzine said yesterday he is unlikely to approve the 20 percent property tax credit lawmakers favor unless the Legislature first adopts other reforms, like a state comptroller's office and a 4 percent limit on future property tax increases.

"If I don't see the elements that give me confidence that we have the ability to sustain these over a period of time, we will hold up a tax credit program," Corzine said to reporters after a speech to the New Jersey Business and Industry Association in Woodbridge. "I think those are absolutely essential. I would be very leery not to have those sustainability conditions in a program."

Senate President Richard Codey (D-Essex) and Assembly Speaker Joseph Roberts (D-Camden) last month capped months of special hearings on property tax reform by announcing a plan to cut 20 percent from the property tax bills of "most" New Jersey homeowners.

The plan has since been refined. Currently it would cost $2 billion and offer property tax credits of 20 percent to homeowners earning up to $100,000; 15 percent to those earning between $100,000 and $200,000, and 10 percent for those with incomes between $200,000 and $250,000.

Yesterday, both Codey and Roberts accepted the Corzine's conditions for passage of the credit program.

"We have no problem with that at all," Codey said.

"The governor is right -- the 20 percent credit cannot be enacted in a vacuum," Assembly Speaker Joseph Roberts (D-Camden) said. "Establishing caps and a comptroller are essential elements in sustaining any property tax credit."

Corzine said work on the reform measures could stretch into February, well after the Dec. 31 deadline lawmakers had set for themselves.

"I don't think false dates like Jan. 1 are as important as knowing that when we write a budget, which this year is due Feb. 27, that we have in place a sustainable system of property tax reform," Corzine said. The budget must make its way through the Legislature and be signed into law by July 1.

But Codey said the credit program needs to be adopted quickly so the Treasury Department can set up the mechanism for delivering it when property tax bills go out next year.

Lawmakers are preparing to consider a full slate of property tax reform measures tomorrow, the final time both the full Senate and Assembly are scheduled to meet before year's end.

On Monday, lawmakers balked when they got their first look at the reform legislation that resulted from months of work by four special committees set up to find way to rein in school and local government spending.

"We looked at the recommendations and found it was hard to find the number of votes necessary for passage -- 21 in the Senate, 41 in the Assembly -- to pass these recommendations," Sen. Shirley Turner (D-Mercer), a top ranking Democrat, told a gathering of 83 mayors, council members and municipal officials at a convention in Lawrence yesterday.

"Now, sadly we find nothing all are in support of -- except everybody wants a 20 percent property tax cut," Turner said. "Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to do what it takes to get there."

The Senate has tentatively posted nine property tax-related measures for consideration tomorrow, including one (S-2) that would establish a comptroller's office to monitor spending by state and local governments.

Another (S-8) is a pared-down package of pension and health benefits reforms that follows Corzine's directive to limit the changes to elected and appointed officials. Thousands of teachers and unionized state workers had rallied in front of the Statehouse Monday to protest attempts to legislate changes to their publicly funded pensions. Corzine has said he will seek changes in contract negotiations with the unions.

Senators also are scheduled to consider amended versions of bills that passed the Assembly on Monday, including one (S-1) that would set up a special commission to target towns for consolidation, and another (S-10) to overhaul school board elections and establish county superintendents with veto power over local school budgets.

Both measures face opposition among Democrats, who control both the Senate and Assembly.

"Many objections have to do with the extreme powers extended to these super-superintendents," Sen. Barbara Buono (D-Middlesex), said after the bills were discussed in the Democratic party meeting on Monday.

Local officials at the New Jersey League of Municipalities conference where Turner spoke also weighed in against the new superintendents.

One, Glen Ridge Mayor Carl A. Bergmanson, called the plan "one of the worst proposals, one of the most bonehead proposals to come out of the Assembly, and that is saying a lot."

And another said local governments will never merge willingly.

"The only way consolidation will happen is if it is ordered (by the state)," said South Brunswick Manager Matthew U. Watkins, a former director of the state Division of Local Government Services. "None of us are going to do it voluntarily."

On Monday the proposal sparked a short-lived revolt on the Assembly floor by lawmakers from Essex and Hudson County, who denounced the plan as an intrusion into local affairs. Though the Assembly passed the plan on Monday, it will have to be considered again if the Senate adopts a different version.

State releases study showing how much education costs — hypothetically — in N.J.

By DIANE D'AMICO Education Writer, (609) 272-7241

Published: Wednesday, December 13, 2006

TRENTON — The long-awaited state Department of Education study on the cost of education in New Jersey was released Tuesday and is generating more questions than answers.

The median cost to provide a basic education to a child in New Jersey is about $7,367 in K-8 districts and $8,496 in K-12 districts, according to the study. That amount does not include transportation or capital expenses.

Thousands of additional dollars per student also would be needed to address special needs such as disabilities and poverty, bringing the average cost per student statewide to more than $11,000, or about $15.8 billion, which is just about what is already being spent.

The Department of Education did the study as the basis for the state to come up with a new funding formula. But education advocates who have been following the process said they are concerned that any model based on hypothetical districts should not be considered until the model has been run using real districts.

“The trouble with using the hypothetical models is that they don't bear any relationship to the real districts in the state,” said David Sciarra of the Education Law Center, which represents children in the 31 poor, urban Abbott districts. The law center sued the state to get the study released. “That's what was wrong with the funding plan under former Gov. (Christie) Whitman.”

Lynne Strickland, executive director of the Garden State Coalition of Schools, which represents suburban districts, said they too are concerned that the model used by the state has not been tested.

“Until we can see it used in real time, you can't really tell what it would mean,” she said.

The results of the study estimated total statewide spending at about $15.8 billion a year. The districts already spend $15.6 billion, and Sciarra was a bit suspicious that the state model came so close to actual spending. He said he was concerned that the model is based on what the state wants districts to spend, not what they actually need.

The state's consultant, John Augenblick, noted in the study that in other states, including Maryland and New York, the amount of money needed has been much larger than current funding levels.

Three public hearings will be held around the state Monday, including a remote teleconference from the Richard Stockton College in Galloway Township from 9:30 am. to noon. Both Strickland and Sciarra said having just a few days to digest and comment on the 98-page report, after the state spent more than three years preparing it, was not likely to generate meaningful discussion.

Commissioner Lucille Davy said the hearings are just the beginning of the process, and more hearings would be held in January.

The state used two models to determine their costs. The first was averaging the actual costs in 305 so-called “successful districts.” Success was defined as meeting the state passing rates on state tests given in 2004-2005. Strickland said the current state benchmark is not that high, and implies that the state goal is not excellence, but just average student performance.

“Why should we be aiming for average?” she said.

Sciarra noted that the most successful districts include many that spend the most money, but the model does nothing to really examine how the money is spent, and whether it is all spent wisely.

The second model was based on creating six hypothetical models of different-sized K-8 and K-12 districts. Sciarra said the so-called Professional Judgement Panel, or PJP, model can be effective, but that in the true model, the panels create the models, not the state. In New Jersey, he said, the state created the models and just got comment on them from the panels.

“None of the models addressed the specific needs of real high-poverty urban districts,” he said.

Strickland also mentioned that a funding formula is only as good as the money put behind it, and there has been little discussion of how much the state would contribute and how it would be distributed.

Both Sciarra and Strickland called for more time to look more specifically at New Jersey districts. Both said the current plan appears to differ little from the old CEIFA funding model, which the state has ignored for the last five years. Sciarra said legislators and the governor have talked about a funding system based on children, not districts, yet the model used in the report looks at model districts, not actual students.

“This ignores the Abbott Supreme Court rulings,” Sciarra said. “They could have at least looked at the actual urban districts.”

The full report, and information on the public hearings, is online at www. state.nj.us/education. The Education Law Center has some of its own analyisis online at www.edlawcenter.org

To e-mail Diane D'Amico at The Press:

DDamico@pressofac.com

 

Lawmakers may miss deadline for property tax reform

Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 12/12/06

BY JONATHAN TAMARI
GANNETT STATE BUREAU

TRENTON — The fight to rein in property taxes moved ahead in fits and starts Monday, as some proposals stalled and legislative leaders conceded they will almost surely miss their self-imposed Jan. 1 deadline for most elements of their plan.

But one key piece of the package won Assembly approval after 8 p.m. Monday, and the state's leading lawmakers said they were back on the same page with Gov. Jon S. Corzine, pledging to advance their plans by the end of January.

"This clearly has been a frustrating process, but nothing that is this tough, nothing that is this important, is going to be done easily," said Assembly Speaker Joseph J. Roberts Jr., D-Camden.

Roberts and Senate President Richard J. Codey, D-Essex, sat down with Corzine in separate meetings Monday after a conflict on proposed benefit changes — and several prickly exchanges — threatened to drive a wedge between the three men who essentially run state government and hold the keys to property tax reforms.

Codey conceded there had been a communication breakdown but said the two sides resolved to get back on track with their plans for a 20 percent property tax credit for most homeowners, a cap on tax hikes and a new school funding formula.

"If we don't do it by February 1, shame on us," Codey said.

"We're very much on the same page and working together. The issue isn't so much how we do this, it's that we get it done and we get it done right," Roberts said.

Roberts won a victory after a long day of work when his plan to empower county school superintendents to control education spending — the source of the bulk of property tax bills — passed the Assembly.

The bill, which Roberts called a "significant building block," would also make changes to encourage municipalities to share services and move school board and fire district elections to November, when there is more voter participation.

The plan, however, faces some critics in the Senate, which did not take action on the bill.

Sen. Barbara Buono, D—Middlesex, worried that Roberts' plan, which would give county superintendents a line-item veto over local education budgets, would hurt local control of schools.

As thousands of teachers and state government employees rallied outside the Statehouse to warn lawmakers against benefit cuts, Roberts said any changes dealing with rank-and-file workers will be left to contract negotiations between Corzine and labor unions. Changes to end abuses by elected and appointed officials will move forward in the Legislature, Roberts said.

Corzine, who had urged lawmakers to be bold in their reforms, angered lawmakers last week when he asked them to delay action on public employee pension and benefit cuts. In a letter sent Sunday evening, Corzine said lawmakers' action could damage negotiations with labor unions, where he may seek a range of concessions.

Republicans chided Democrats for the recent disarray after four months of hearings intended to lay out the solutions to curb New Jersey's highest-in-the-nation property taxes.

"There appears to be some confusion on the Democratic side this week. I hope they get it together," said Sen. William Gormley, R-Atlantic.

Questions remained around several other plans, including proposals to launch a commission to push for municipal mergers and create a state comptroller to oversee state spending — a Corzine priority.

Those measures had been expected to move quickly and mark tangible action on easing the state's property taxes. But eight out of 12 Senate bills related to the issue were held up Monday. In the Assembly, seven of 10 bills advanced, including the measure to encourage mergers.

"The comptroller bill needs a lot of work," said Assemblyman John Burzichelli, D-Gloucester, one of the plan's sponsors.

Burzichelli, who is also mayor of Paulsboro, had concerns about how much power the comptroller could have to investigate and block local spending. Corzine has called for an office that can dig into spending at all levels of government.

Buono said the process was moving too fast and could lead to unintended consequences.

Buono said a commission that recommended town mergers would take power away from local officials, noting that her hometown, Metuchen, would be a likely target for consolidation as it is completely surrounded by Edison.

"What this does in my mind is create a shadow government," Buono said.

Jonathan Tamari: jtamari@gannett.com