Home About GSCS What's New Issues School Funding Coming Up
Quick Links
Meeting Schedule
NJ Legislature
Governor's Office
NJ Department of Education
State Board of Education
GSCS Testimonies
GSCS Data & Charts
Contact Us

Email: gscschools@gmail.com
Phone: 609-394-2828 (office)
             732-618-5755 (cell)

Mailing Address:
Garden State Coalition of Schools
Elisabeth Ginsburg, Executive Director
160 West State Street
Trenton, New Jersey 08608


12-13-12 Education Issues in the News
Star Ledger - Report: Nearly all of Newark's most disadvantaged students attend failing schools

NJ Spotlight - Newark Schools Chief Pulls No Punches in Depicting Challenges…Superintendent presents new study’s data in bid to make case for major reforms

Star Ledger - Report: Nearly all of Newark's most disadvantaged students attend failing schools

NJ Spotlight - Newark Schools Chief Pulls No Punches in Depicting Challenges…Superintendent presents new study’s data in bid to make case for major reforms

Star Ledger - Report: Nearly all of Newark's most disadvantaged students attend failing schools

By Jessica Calefati/The Star-LedgerThe Star-Ledger
on December 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, updated December 12, 2012 at 8:53 PM

Brought to you by

NEWARK — Nearly all of Newark’s most disadvantaged elementary and middle school students attend failing district and charter schools, a report released today has found.

The report, commissioned by the district and prepared by the Boston-based consulting company Parthenon, analyzed student proficiency in math and reading, college readiness and test score growth in 85 charter and district schools across the state’s largest city.

It classified about 14,000 K-8 students as being "highest need," based on factors such as backgrounds, home lives, English language proficiency and special education classification.

Students were ranked in three groups. Within the neediest group, fewer than 5 percent attend top schools, the report found.

Superintendent Cami Anderson said the report’s findings will help with decisions she expects to make next year about whether to close or consolidate schools. Her decision to overhaul a dozen schools last year drew criticism from some teachers and parents.

"This data will force us to think about taking aggressive measures to improve student outcomes," Anderson said. "We have to lay out the facts so we know how to change."

The district funded Parthenon’s work with help from the Newark Charter School Fund and the Foundation for Newark’s Future.

Officials from the three groups said they plan to use the report’s findings as a benchmark to boost learning among targeted student groups across the city.

Parthenon also looked at student test scores and how much they improved from 2011 to 2012 compared with similar students at other schools.

Nearly 60 percent of Newark’s elementary and middle schools — 43 district schools and seven charters — are "falling further behind," the report says, because their students’ test scores are low and stagnant.

Four district schools and three charters among the 86 analyzed are "beating the odds" with high test scores and high score growth, the report found.

The report does not name any schools with test scores flagged as examples of success or failure, making it difficult to know, based on the findings, whether children attend a successful or failing school.

Another report released two weeks ago by Stanford University’s Center for Research on Education Outcomes found that statewide, students in charter schools learn more than their district school counterparts. But that report also failed to name the schools included in the analysis.

Mashea Ashton, CEO of the Newark Charter School Fund, said both reports show Newark charter schools’ success "can’t be explained away by simply saying charter schools are serving a different population."

The Parthenon report found that among the 43 percent of Newark students classified as "highest need," charter schools enroll 3 percent and district schools enroll 40 percent.

High school performance also was covered in the report, and statistics reveal a bleak picture.

Only a quarter of students enrolled in Newark’s 18 magnet and traditional high schools entered ninth grade prepared, test results show. Charter high schools were excluded from the analysis.

In addition, only 4 percent of students who enter high school after failing tests in eighth grade passed HSPA, the state’s traditional high school graduation exam.

Though all students enrolled in the district’s magnet schools have a greater likelihood of graduating from high school prepared for college or a career, only a small number of mostly top students gain admission to the competitive schools.

Last year, nearly 80 percent of the city’s eighth-graders applied to magnet schools, but only 27 percent were admitted, indicating students of all types aspire to attend magnets, while only a fraction are prepared for admission.



NJ Spotlight - Newark Schools Chief Pulls No Punches in Depicting Challenges…Superintendent presents new study’s data in bid to make case for major reforms

By John Mooney, December 13, 2012 in Education|2 Comments

Newark Schools Superintendent Cami Anderson this week rolled out some new and not-so-flattering data about her schools as she presses for changes in the face of a rising charter-school presence and a tough budget outlook in her city.

Related Links

In a two-hour presentation to reporters yesterday that will be repeated for community groups this month, Anderson did not temper her description of the poverty and other enormous problems facing the state’s largest city.

She noted that virtually all of Newark’s schools – both in the district and charters – are serving students in the state’s bottom fifth in socio-economic status.

But she said that even within that segment of the population there is a wide range of achievement levels that showed both the successes and weaknesses of individual schools, according to the new study commissioned by the district, the Newark Charter School Fund and the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Foundation for Newark’s Future.

Anderson said most of the highest achieving schools were public charter schools not run by the district.

“Without getting into all the nuances, the differences are undeniable,” she said of the gaps between district and charter schools.

But this has been hotly-debated topic in the state, and those “nuances” showed some variations, too. The latest study found that putting students in charter schools was no guarantee of success, either, at least as measured by test scores.

Based on 2010-2011 data on student growth, six of the city’s 12 charter elementary schools showed high performance or improvement on state achievement tests, but an equal number had neither those strong scores nor student-performance improvements. The study did not identify which schools placed where in the spectrum.

Nonetheless, the picture for the district’s public schools was far worse, according to the study developed by the Parthenon consulting group. A small fraction of the schools showed gains in the years studied, but even the highest performing district schools had shortcomings.

For instance, the city’s magnet high schools – where students typically must take a test for admission – posted far higher achievement results than the comprehensive high schools, but with some caveats. Even in those schools, fewer than half – 40 percent -- met benchmarks for college readiness in the national ACT exam that is now taken by all high school students in the district.

“Even while we celebrate our magnets, we need to continue to keep them to a high bar,” Anderson said.

What happens next is unclear. Anderson said the study didn’t change any of her own reform strategies for the district, but rather helped “sharpen our goals.”

And she was clearly putting some resources into the public roll-out of the information, including a presentation to the district’s School Advisory Board on Tuesday. Virtually all of her top staff -- including a half-dozen assistant superintendents and special assistants – attended yesterday’s presentation, which was held in a district conference room.

“Truth is truth,” Anderson said when asked about the data’s purpose. “We have to have a data-driven, frank discussion.”

The push comes at a time when the superintendent, appointed by Gov. Chris Christie 18 months ago, will be making some tough choices about the fate of individual schools -- decisions sure to generate considerable blow-back from the city’s vocal community activists and school advocates.

One of her slides in the 34-page PowerPoint presentation showed the excess capacity in the district’s school buildings, representing as many as 7,000 seats in a district of 37,000 students.

The excess led, at least in part, to Anderson’s push to close and consolidate schools in her first year. Yesterday, Anderson did not rule out the possibility that schools that continue to show low achievement may be subject to strong intervention, ranging from closures to replacement of their staffs.

She said those decisions were still a few months away, as the latest school and student data will be made available by the state in January.

“Any school that has appeared in the (bottom) tier and stayed there for two years in a row, that would cause us to ask some serious questions,” she said. “It will force us to think about some aggressive measures.”


Garden State Coalition of Schools
160 W. State Street, Trenton New Jersey 08608