Home About GSCS What's New Issues School Funding Coming Up
Quick Links
Meeting Schedule
NJ Legislature
Governor's Office
NJ Department of Education
State Board of Education
GSCS Testimonies
GSCS Data & Charts
Contact Us

Email: gscschools@gmail.com
Phone: 609-394-2828 (office)
             732-618-5755 (cell)

Mailing Address:
Garden State Coalition of Schools
Elisabeth Ginsburg, Executive Director
160 West State Street
Trenton, New Jersey 08608

Search
Twitter

10-24-13 Education Issues in the News
The Record - NJ eighth-graders pass global test...New Jersey eighth-graders fared well in math and science in the first federal study to rank the state against competitors abroad — but its performance still trailed behind the top-scoring Asian education systems.

Times of Trenton- Judge tells SDA, school board to agree to new schedule for repairs to Trenton Central High School

The Record - NJ eighth-graders pass global test

Thursday, October 24, BY  LESLIE BRODYSTAFF WRITER

 

New Jersey eighth-graders fared well in math and science in the first federal study to rank the state against competitors abroad — but its performance still trailed behind the top-scoring Asian education systems.

South Korea, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong and Japan took the highest spots in math. The projected average score for public school students in New Jersey (545 out of 1,000 points) brought the Garden State in at No. 9, following Massachusetts, Vermont and Minnesota. That’s above Russia, Israel and Finland, often seen as a model for school reform.

Average scores in science followed a similar pattern: New Jersey ranked No. 14 in the study, which compared all 50 states, 38 countries and nine smaller systems abroad, such as several provinces in Canada. These scores are based on complex projections using two long-established tests.

The report was the first to link scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress — widely seen as the “gold standard” in comparing states — to a global test known as the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study from 2011.

Researchers said they embarked on the project because so many governors and lawmakers clamored for evidence on how their students stacked up against competitors worldwide.

“It’s a good news, bad news scenario” for New Jersey, said Jack Buckley, commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics, which released the report today. “Students in New Jersey are doing very well compared to many counterparts in the U.S. but still have some room to go when we look at the very highest-performing” systems abroad. The details bolster his point. In South Korea, Singapore and Taipei, for example, nearly 50 percent of eighth-graders scored as “advanced,” while only 16 percent of New Jersey students did that well.

Rankings of countries often ignite a round of hand-wringing about America’s ability to thrive in a tough global marketplace, along with a backlash from those who argue American schools deserve applause overall, despite pockets of failure. “People with a particular agenda will seize on one dimension of the story that supports their case,” Buckley said.

The new study involves many projections. Testing is so expensive that students in only nine states took the international test. All states participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Scores from students who took both tests were used to extrapolate how peers in New Jersey and other states would fare on the international test. Several researchers who were not part of the “linking” study said this methodology was valid as long as results were seen as estimates.

Some researchers say such rankings often reflect the socioeconomic status of the students being tested more than a school system’s quality. But others point to many factors at play in achievement, including teacher training, cultural respect for the teaching profession, curriculum, hours spent studying and parental expectations.

“We are much more diverse than most countries in the world and very open to immigration compared to other countries,” said Tom Loveless, an education policy expert at the Brookings Institution. “Those factors do depress scores. On the other hand, it is still excuse-making. We can do better, and that’s what we should focus on.”

Loveless said the top-scoring Asian countries emphasize perseverance in math and science. He cited one study that tracked how Chinese, Japanese and American parents reacted when they saw their children botch a math problem. American parents typically said, “He’s never been good in math,” while the Asian parents tended to respond, “My kid has to work harder.”

“Parents in these high-scoring nations have a view that it takes hard work to learn and it’s a very difficult subject,” he said.

Elaine Rainone, an eighth-grade science teacher at Rochelle Park’s Midland School, echoed his view. She was “extremely disappointed” to find that only half of the 28 students in one class met the deadline for an easy homework assignment converting a recipe to metric units. “Some of our students need to understand that home is an extension of the school day,” she said. “It doesn’t end at 2:45 p.m.”

To the disappointment of the new report’s researchers, two major economic powerhouses, India and China, didn’t participate. The organization overseeing the project said it required all countries involved to follow strict rules on data collection and test security, and monitored some data-gathering sessions to ensure compliance.

Winners of international rankings differ depending on the group of countries involved and the specific test. Finland, for example, is famous for scoring well on one for 15-year-olds called the Programme for International Student Assessment, which measures reasoning skills and real world problem-solving. Finland did not do quite as well on the international test used in today’s report, which is more tied to curriculum and tries to check what children learn in class. Critics of tests in general stress they don’t capture creativity, grit and other aptitudes important to long-term success. Andreas Schleicher, an expert in international comparisons, has found that students tend to perform well in systems that attract great people to the teaching profession, then give them ongoing professional development, autonomy and time to prepare lessons.

Wide scoring range Today’s report found a wide range among American states, from Massachusetts (with an average score of 561) in math to Alabama (466). Thirty-six states scored higher than the international average in math; 47 did so in science. The international average score for both math and science was 500.

To Grant Wiggins, an educational consultant in Hopewell, the study highlights disparities in school quality across the country. “It’s not that our good schools aren’t good; it’s that the variability of schools is wider than in other places,” Wiggins said. “Because of local control, because teachers work in isolation, because until recently there was no national framework — there is wide variability teacher to teacher, school to school, and district to district. … That doesn’t happen in a place like Singapore. They have more quality assurance.” “International comparisons have to be taken with a lot of qualifiers,” he added, “but it’s a wake-up call.” This study comes at a time of intense efforts to improve education in New Jersey, which is rolling out new teacher evaluations, new online state tests and a new set of voluntary national standards called the Common Core, which spells out what children should master in each grade.

Christopher Nagy, superintendent of Northern Valley Regional School District, said the confluence of changes was “extremely burdensome and placing tremendous pressure on districts.” “On the flip side of the coin,” he added, “once we work through all these issues, with hopefully some additional funding to manage all of these initiatives, I think we will be in a better position” to help students compete. New Jersey Education Commissioner Christopher Cerf said the report underscored the need to close achievement gaps, which leave too many disadvantaged children unprepared. “New Jersey students, on the whole, are strong performers when compared to students from other states,” he stated by email. “That’s good news, for which we owe our educators a huge debt of gratitude. However, today’s students will compete in a global, knowledge-centered economy in which all children will need to graduate truly ready for college and career if they are going to have a fair shot at success in life.”

Email: brody@northjersey.com Twitter: @lesliebrody

 

Times of Trenton- Judge tells SDA, school board to agree to new schedule for repairs to Trenton Central High School

By Jenna Pizzi The Times, Trenton Follow on Twitter on October 24, 2013

Email

TRENTON — An attorney for the school board said yesterday parties in the battle over repairs to the dilapidated Trenton Central High School would sit down and try to work together for a speedier solution, in compliance with a Superior Court judge’s request.

“The court will defer any ruling and see if the professionals can work something out,” Richard Shapiro said after Judge Douglas Hurd called rival attorneys in for a conference before a scheduled hearing yesterday morning and urged them to come up with a resolution. 

The school board sued the state Schools Development Authority in August, arguing that it is taking too long to make repairs to the 81-year-old school. The district claims that because the state has held up repairs the leaking roof, mold and other problems at the school are unhealthy and unsafe for teachers, students and staff. The SDA has fought the suit, saying the district did not try to work within the SDA’s administrative process to resolve the timeline.

Shapiro declined to say when the discussions would take place or how soon a decision could be made.

SDA officials have declined to comment on the ongoing legal process, citing a policy of not discussing legal matters; but they reiterated yesterday they have worked diligently with school officials to remediate the long list of problems at the aging school and that they continue to be earnest about improving conditions there for students and staff.

“The SDA is investing millions of dollars for construction and improvements for Trenton Central High School for the benefit of the community and its students,” said spokeswoman Kristen MacLean. “Emergent projects have already been completed, while design of the overall improvements is under way, which means large-scale construction will begin by the end of the school year when students are out of the building.” MacLean said that, in the meantime, the Trenton School District continues to use its considerable state budget resources to do regular and preventative maintenance.

The district has taken issue with the SDA’s plan, announced this summer, to make up to $28 million in repairs to the school over the next two years. The district said the timeline, which included construction beginning on the exterior of the building next summer and construction on the building’s interior in 2015, should be accelerated. The SDA is responsible for major projects and new construction in poor school districts across the state.

In the lawsuit, the Trenton district is asking the SDA to either speed up the process or grant the district the money to complete the repairs.

District maintenance officials have complained that it is left to them to make emergency repairs to the school when problems that have gone unaddressed by the SDA further decay into dangerous circumstances. This summer the school district funded $2.7 million in repairs to the school to fix portions of the roof and renovate the auditorium. When crews took up the auditorium floor, they discovered a crack in the concrete slab and the room was deemed unsafe for use. The floor has since been supported by a steel beam, and the renovation work is continuing.

While the latest developments in the courthouse drama over Trenton High were playing themselves out, less than a mile away protesters launched a fresh demonstration in support of rapid improvements at the city school and others in similar plight around New Jersey.

The Healthy Schools Now Coalition, a partnership between the state Work Environment Council, state teacher’s union, and parents organizations, were outside the Statehouse calling attention to what they called hazardous conditions at schools in poor districts that they say are suffering from neglect.

“The governor and SDA should be ashamed of these conditions,” said Mo Kinberg, the campaign organizer for the NJWEC. “The governor cannot ignore what is happening in the schools.”

Coalition members stood outside the capitol building holding photos of the deficiencies inside the schools.

“From the point of view of the parents who see for themselves these conditions — they wonder where the state is,” said Elizabeth Smith, executive director of the Statewide Education Organizing Committee, a parent advocate group.

Marie Blistan, vice president of the New Jersey Education Association, said the coalition wants Gov. Chris Christie and the SDA to commit to making the repairs in a timely fashion. Blistan said for many of these projects money was allocated by the Legislature several years ago, but the funding has not trickled down to the schools in need.

Blistan said the poor conditions that low-income students are forced to endure in their schools are not conducive to learning.

The coalition is asking parents and teachers to reach out to Christie to demand action from the SDA.

Contact Jenna Pizzi at jpizzi@njtimes.com or (609) 989-5717

 

 


Garden State Coalition of Schools
160 W. State Street, Trenton New Jersey 08608
609-394-2828