Quality Public Education for All New Jersey Students

 

 
     Pre 2012 Announcement Archives
     2012-13 Announcement Archives
     2013-14 Announcement Archives
     2014-15 Announcement Archives
     Old Announcements prior April 2009
     ARCHIVE inc 2007 Announcements
     2009 Archives
     2008 Archives
     2007 Archives
     2006 Archives
     2010-11 Announcements
     2005 through Jan 30 2006 Announcements
4-12 and 13-11 Education Issues in the News
Star Ledger - Increasing school funding formula would lower percentage of aid to N.J.'s poorest districts, analysis shows

The Record - Legislator says state aid cuts hurt Paterson schools

njspotlight.com - Controversial Proposal Moves Ahead, While BOE Delays Votes on Other Mandates - Administration still pushing to allow non-educators to fill school superintendent slots

Star Ledger - Increasing school funding formula would lower percentage of aid to N.J.'s poorest districts, analysis shows

Published: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 9:45 PM     Updated: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 12:09 AM

By Jessica Calefati/The Star-Ledger The Star-Ledger

TRENTON — Plugging more money into the state’s school funding formula would lower the percentage of aid sent to New Jersey’s largest, poorest districts, according to an analysis of the Department of Education’s budget.

Under the proposed budget, 56.4 percent of the $7 billion allocated for state aid will go to these districts, known as former Abbott districts, the nonpartisan Office of Legislative Services’ analysis said.

But if the formula is funded fully for fiscal year 2011-12, that percentage would drop to 50.9 percent, suggesting to at least one legislator that not all of the state’s at-risk children, who cost the most to educate, are stuck in failing urban districts as Gov. Chris Christie often argues.

The analysis was made available at an Assembly Budget Committee hearing.

Committee Chairman Louis Greenwald (D-Camden) said the School Funding Reform Act of 2008 was designed so money would follow the state’s neediest children, no matter where they live or which schools they attend.

"I don’t represent any former Abbott districts, but I know I have these kids in my district," said Greenwald, who represents wealthy New Jersey suburbs like Voorhees and Cherry Hill. "I know they succeed when the formula is in place."

Greenwald chided acting Education Commissioner Christopher Cerf, who testified before the committee, for proposing another Department of Education budget that fails to fund the formula fully. Though districts will receive $250 million more this year than they received last year, the formula is still underfunded by $1.7 billion, according to the analysis.

The state Supreme Court is considering the constitutionality of Christie’s decision to cut $1 billion in school aid from the fiscal 2010-2011 budget.

The Education Law Center, which brought the suit, argues the cuts violated the state’s obligation to provide a "thorough and efficient" education to poor children.

During today’s hearing, Cerf advocated the state’s position — that New Jersey’s desperate financial situation made it impossible to fully fund the formula. The same argument stands for this year, Cerf said.

 

The Record - Legislator says state aid cuts hurt Paterson schools

Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Last updated: Wednesday April 13, 2011, 8:37 AM

BY LESLIE BRODYAND ZACH PATBERG

The Record

STAFF WRITERS

Democratic Assemblywoman Nellie Pou made an impassioned plea Tuesday at a Trenton budget hearing as she invited acting education chief Christopher Cerf to visit Paterson schools to see for himself the pain of state aid cuts.

Pou, who represents Paterson, described this year's elimination of most art and music programs, hundreds of teacher layoffs and classes "overcrowded with 30 to 35 children."

Cerf promised to visit. "I would love to tour classrooms and experience firsthand what you're describing," he said. "I would value that very much."

Pou's invitation came after the Assembly budget committee grilled Cerf for more than two hours on a range of budget issues, often focusing on last year's aid cuts to districts. The state Supreme Court is now considering whether Governor Christie's aid cuts to schools last year were constitutional; advocates argue the cuts violated the state's obligation to provide a thorough and efficient education to poor urban children.

A report by the Office of Legislative Services says that the governor's proposed budget for fiscal 2012 allocates $7 billion for state formula aid to schools, a shortfall of $1.7 billion from the sum required by the state's 2008 school funding formula.

The OLS report noted that under the governor's proposed budget, Paterson would get $371 million in state aid for fiscal 2012, or $38.5 million less than dictated by the funding formula.

Some district officials and advocates commended Pou's diagnosis of the schools and used it as a chance to push for more local autonomy. The district has been under state control for 20 years — school board President Theodore Best has described the oversight as "handcuffs."

Fernando Martinez, of the parents' group Paterson Education Organizing Committee, said the board, which is now just an advisory body to the state, should have "more power in terms of programs to implement and moving money around."

State officials "are not here every day, they don't know what the needs are," he said, pointing to science labs still waiting for supplies and 100-year-old buildings that leak.

Longtime board commissioner Jonathan Hodges said poor test scores by students correspond to the dwindling state aid.

The state-appointed superintendent, Donnie Evans, had no comment beyond welcoming Cerf to visit the district.

Cerf repeated the administration's argument that the cuts were necessitated by the state's fiscal crisis. He said money poured into troubled districts could have better results if used more efficiently, especially if it could be used to attract the best teachers to the most challenging classrooms.

The Supreme Court plans to hear another round of oral arguments in the funding case April 20.

E-mail: brody@northjersey.com

Njspotlight.com - Controversial Proposal Moves Ahead, While BOE Delays Votes on Other Mandates - Administration still pushing to allow non-educators to fill school superintendent slots By John Mooney, April 12 in Education The state Board of Education yesterday moved quickly -- and quietly -- to buy the Christie administration some time in its review of the state’s rules and regulations for school districts. But one controversial proposal is moving ahead: the administration’s plan to ease the certification requirements for school superintendents that would allow non-educators into the field. Yesterday afternoon, the board held a quickly assembled meeting, with all members calling in by phone, to adopt a resolution that extends the expiration date of key regulations coming before the board this year, including those for special education and vocational education. The board adopted the measure 7-0. The resolution effectively gives the administration more time for its newly appointed task force to go through all the mandates faced by schools, with the intent of eliminating or consolidating those it deems wasteful or redundant. Gov. Chris Christie created the task force earlier this month by executive order, asking it return its first recommendation by August 15. The resolution had been up for consideration last week when the state board held its regular monthly meeting, but had to be put off for public notice reasons. At the same time, the board considered several key proposals, including the state’s new anti-bullying law. On Hold State board president Arcelio Aponte said those considerations could be put on hold as the task force does its review. He stressed it was not a moratorium on all new regulations, only a step that prevents any of these specific ones from lapsing while the task force completes its work. "This just allows us not to have worry so much about the timing," Aponte said in an interview afterward. "As they look into the regulations, they may see some that are redundant for school districts, and if there are ways to cut any redundancy, that is a good thing." Still, one measure is proceeding i n the face of considerable opposition. Christie has proposed that low-performing districts be allowed – with the state’s approval – to hire leaders who are not certified as school superintendents. A Super for Newark Notable among the districts now looking for superintendents is Newark, which the state now oversees. The district is the center of a high-profile reform effort centered on the $100 million gift from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Acting Education Commissioner Chris Cerf and others are currently considering candidates for the job, with Christie saying one would be chosen by the end of this month. Cerf has not said whether any of the finalists are non-educators, but the administrative code which would allow that flexibility is moving briskly, with the next public hearing set for May 4. Although the proposal appears to have support on the state board, some members and others have questioned whether the state wants individuals without school leadership experience to lead some of its most troubled districts. Yesterday, State Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver weighed in with a press release pointing out the failed tenure of now-former New York City schools chancellor Cathie Black, the publishing executive hired by Mayor Michael Bloomberg who resigned last week after a tumultuous three months. "New York City should be a lesson to us all that we run the risk of putting our children's education in serious peril without someone with bona fide credentials at the helm," Oliver’s statement read. "No matter how smart or successful a person may be in another industry, the education field can pose a serious learning curve." "Given the significant challenges we face right now, our most underperforming school districts do not have the luxury of time to wait for someone to adjust to these learning curves," Oliver said.