Quality Public Education for All New Jersey Students

 

 
     3-30-13 Education in the News - Dept of Education-State Budget, Autism Rates in NJ
     3-20-12 Education Issues in the News
     3-6-12Tenure Reform News - Discussion at Senate Education Committee
     2-23-12 State Aid Figures Released late today: GSCS Statement
     2-29-12 NJTV on NJ School Funding...and, Reporters' Roundtable back on the aire
     S1455 Ruiz TEACHNJ Act, introduced February 2012
     S1455 Ruiz TEACHNJ Act
     November Elections for Schools - Department of Education FAQ's
     1-18-12 GSCS ‘Take’ on the School Elections Law
     1-24-12 Education Issues in the News
     1-24-12 Supreme Court Justices Nominated by Governor Christie
     Committe Assignments for 2012-2013 under the new 215th Legislature rolling out
     Education Transformation Task Force Initial Report...45 recommendations for starters
     9-12-11 Governor's Press Notice & Fact Sheet re: Education Transformation Task Force Report
     Democrat Budget Proposal per S4000, for Fiscal Year 2011-2012
     Additional School Aid [if the school funding formula,SFRA, were fully funded for all districts] per Millionaires' Tax bill S2969
     6-24-11 Democrat Budget Proposal brings aid to all districts
     6-1-11 Supreme Court Justice nominee, Anne Paterson, passed muster with Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday by 11-1 margin
     4-29-11 BOOMERANG! Near 80 per cent of School Budgets Passed in Wednesday'sSchool Elections
     4-26-11 School Elections, Randi Weingarten in NJ, Special Educ Aid, Shared Services bill
     4-25-11 Charter Schools in Suburbia: More Argument than Agreement
     4-24-11 Major Education Issues in the News
     4-21-11 Supreme Court hears school funding argument
     4-14-11 Governor Releases Legislation to Address Education Reform Package
     4-13-11 Governor's Proposed Legislation on Education Reform April 2011
     4-5-11 Education Issues in the News
     4-8-11 Education Issues in the News
     4-7-11 Gov. Christie - 'Addressing New Jersey's Most Pressing Education Challenges'
     4-3-11Press of Atlantic City - Pending Supreme Court ruling could boost aid to New Jersey schools
     4-2-11 The Record - Charter school in Hackensack among 58 bids
     4-1-11 N.J. gets 58 charter school applications
     3-31-11 Charters an Issue in the Suburbs - and - So far, only 7 Separate Questions on April School Budget Ballots
     3-26-11 New Jersey’s school-funding battle could use a dose of reality
     Link to Special Master Judge Doyne's Recommendations on School Funding law to the Supreme Court 3-22-11
     3-22-11 Special Master's Report to the Supreme Court: State did not meet its school funding obligation
     GSCS - Local District Listing : Local Funds Transferred to Charter Schools 2001-2010
     GSCS Bar Chart: Statewide Special Education cost percent compared to Regular & Other Instructional cost percent 2004-2011
     3-4-11 'Teacher Evaluation Task Force Files Its Report'
     3-6-11 Poll: Tenure reform being positively received by the public
     Link to Teacher Evaluation Task Force Report
     GSCS Take on Governor's Budget Message
     Gov's Budget Message for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Today, 2pm
     Tenure Reform - Video patch to Commissioner Cerf's presentation on 2-16-10
     2-16-11 Commissioner Cerf talks to educators on Tenure, Merit Pay , related reforms agenda
     Assembly Education Committee hearing Feb 2-10-11
     Assembly Education Committee hearing today, Feb 10, 2011
     9-12-10 ‘Schools coping, in spite of steep cuts'
     12-10-10 ‘NJN could get funding to stay on air as lawmakers weigh network's fate’
     2-7-11 Education - and Controversy - in the News
     1-25-11 Education in the News
     1-24-11 GSCSS Testimony before Assembly Education Committee: Charter School Reform
     1-24-11 GSCS Testimony on Charter School Reform before Assembly Eduction Committee today
     1-20-11 GSCS Testimony before Senator Buono's Education Aid Impact hearing in Edison
     Assembly Education Hearing on Charter School Reform Monday, 1-24-11, 1 pm
     GSCS Board of Trustees endorsed ACTION LETTER to Trenton asking for caution on Charter School expansion
     GSCS testimony on Tenure Reform - Senate Education Committee 12-09-10
     12-12-10 'Rash of upcoming superintendent retirements raises questions on Gov. Christie's pay cap'
     12-8-10 Education & Related Issues in the News - Tenure Reform, Sup't Salary Caps Reactions, Property Valuations Inflated
     12-7-10 Education Issues continue in the news
     12-6-10 njspotlight.com 'Christie to Name New Education Commissioner by Year End'
     12-5-10 Sunday News - Education-related Issues
     11-19-10 In the News - First Hearing held on Superintendent Salary Caps at Kean University
     11-19-10 NJ Spotlight reports on 'National Report Card (NAEP) Rates NJ Schools'
     11-15-10 GSCS meeting with Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver
     GSCS Education Forum Stayed Focused on Quality Education
     Governor's Toolkit Summary - Updated November 2010
     11-18-10 Superintendent Salary Caps to be publicly discussed tonight at Kean University
     10-8-10 Education Issue in the News
     9-15-10 'Governor Christie outlines cuts to N.J. workers' pension, benefits'
     GSCS Heads Up - County-wide school district governance legislation getting ready to move
     9-1-10 Education in the News
     8-31-10 Latest development: Schunder's margin notes reveal application error
     8-27-10 later morning - breaking news: Statehouse Bureau ‘Gov. Chris Christie fires N.J. schools chief Bret Schundler’
     8-27-10 Star Ledger ‘U.S. officials refute Christie on attempt to fix Race to the Top application during presentation’
     8-25-10 Race to the Top articles - the 'day after' news analysis
     8-24-10 Race to the Top Award Recipients named
     8-23-10 S2208 (Sarlo-Allen prime sponsors) passes 36-0 (4 members 'not voting') in the Senate on 8-23-10
     8-16-10 Senate Education hears 'for discussion only' comments re expanding charter school authorization process; Commissioner Schundler relays education priorities to the Committee
     8-13-10 East Brunswick Public School seeks stay on Hatikvah Charter School opening this fall (re: Hatikvah not meeting minimum enrollment requirement)
     7-22-10 'Summer school falls victim to budget cuts in many suburban towns'
     7-21-10 List of bills in Governor's 'Toolkit'
     Governor's Toolkit bills listing
     7-18-10 Troublesome sign of the times? Read article on the growing trend for education foundations - the pressure to provide what the state no longer supports for education...California's Proposition 13 cited
     7-16-10 GSCS Information & Comments - S29 Property Tax Cap Law and Proposal to Reduce Superintendent salaries ....
     7-15 & 16 -10 'Caps - PLURAL!' in the news
     GSCS - High costs of Special Education must be addressed asap, & appropriately
     7-12-10 Assembly passes S29 - the 2% cap bill - 73 to 4, with 3 not voting
     GSCS re:PropertyTax Cap bill - Exemption needed for Special Education enrollment costs
     7-8-10 Tax Caps, Education in the News
     GSCS:Tax Cap Exemption needed for Special Education Costs
     7-3-10 Governor Christie and Legislative leaders reached agreement today on a 2% property tax cap with 4 major exemptions
     7-1 and 2- 10 Governor Christie convened the Legislature to address property tax reform
     6-29-10 GSCS - The question remains: ? Whither property Tax Reform
     GSCS On the Scene in Trenton: State Budget poised to pass late Monday...Cap Proposals, Opportunity Scholarship Act in Limbo
     GSCS On the Scene in Trenton: Cap Proposals, Opportunity Scholarship Act in Limbo
     6-25-10 Appropriations Act bills for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 available on NJ Legislature website - here are the links
     6-23-10 Trenton News: State Budget on the move...Education Issues
     On the GSCS Radar Screen: Recently proposed (early June '10) legislation S2043 brings back Last Best Offer (LBO) for school boards in negotiations
     On the GSCS RADAR SCREEN S2021 (June '10) sponsored by Senator Tom Kean
     On the GSCS Radar Screen: Recently proposed legislation S2043 brings back Last Best Offer (LBO) for school boards in negotiations
     6-8-10 Education issues in the news today - including 'hold' on pension reform, round two
     On the GSCS Legislative Radar Screen
     6-4-10 S1762 passed unanmiously out of Senate Education Committee yesterday
     6-3-10 RTTT controversy remains top news - articles and editorials, column
     6-2-10 RACE TO THE TOP (RTTT) 'NJ STYLE': It is what it is ...but what exactly is it? Race to the Top application is caught in a crossfire of reports - more information and clarity is needed
     Senate Education Committee Agenda for 6-3-10
     5-11-10 njspotlight.com focuses on NJ's plans for and reactions to education reform
     ADMINISTRATION'S PLANS CITED FOR ROUND 2 - RACE TO THE TOP GRANT
     5-8 & 9-10 Education Reform Proposals Annoucned
     5-9-10 'Gov Christie to propose permanent caps on salary raises for public workers'
     5-3-10 NY Times 'Despite Push, Success at Charter Schools is Mixed
     3-30-10 Race to the Top winners helped by local buy-in
     3-31-10 What's Going on in Local Districts?
     3-26-10 GSCS: Effective & Well-Reasoned Communication with State Leaders is Critical
     3-26-10 School Aid, Budget Shortfall - Impt Related Issues = Front Page News
     3-25-10 NEW PENSION REFORM LAW - INFORMATION
     FAQ's on Pension Reform bills signed into law March 22, 2010
     3-23-10 GSCS Testimony presented to Senate Budget Committee on State Budget FY'11
     3-21-10 Reform bills up for a vote in the Assembly on Monday, March 22
     3-11-10 'GOP vows tools to cut expenses, tighter caps'
     3-5-10 HomeTowne Video taping + interviews of GSCS Summit@Summit
     3-5-10 GSCS Summit@Summit with Bret Schundler to be lead topic on Hall Institute's weekly 2:30 pm podcast today
     2-26-10 'NJ average property taxes grow 3.3 percent to an average of $7,300'
     2-25-10 Gov. Christie's Red Tape Review Comm., chaired by Lt. Gov. Guadagno, to hold public hearings In March
     2-24-10 Pension Reform bills to be introduced in Assembly this Thursday
     2-24-10 'Tight funds raise class sizes that districts long sought to cut'
     2-22-10 Christie and unions poised to do batttle over budget cuts'
     2-19-10 'Acting NJ education commissioner hoping other savings can ward off cuts'
     2-22-10 Trenton Active Today
     Flyer for March 2 Education 'Summit@Summit'
     MARK YOUR CALENDARS! GSCS GENERAL MEMBERSHIP-STATEWIDE MEETING 'THE SUMMIT AT SUMMIT', TUESDAY MARCH 2, 7:30 p.m., Details to follow
     2-14-10 'FAQ's on NJ's state of fiscal emergency declaration by Gov. Christie'
     2-12-10 Assembly Budget hearing posted for this Wednesday, Feb. 17
     FY2010 Budget Solutions - PRESS PACKET
     School Aid Withheld Spreadsheet
     2-12-10 News Coverage: Governor Christie's message on actions to address current fiscal year state budget deficits
     2-11-10 Gov Christie address to Joint Session of the Legislature on state budget and current year aid reduction remains scheduled for today
     2-10-10 'Schools are likely targets for NJ budget cuts'
     2-9-10 News article posted this morning notes potential for large loss of current year school aid
     2-8-10 Northjersey.com editorial 'Tightenting our Belts'
     2-8-10 'School leaders around N.J. wait and worry over state aid figures'
     2-8-10'Gov Christie, lawmakers proporse sweeping pension, health care changes for public employees'
     2-4-10 'Christie advisers call for tough new school rules'
     1-28-10 School Surplus plan to supplant State Aid in this year gaining probability
     Governor Christie Education Transition Team Report , released 1-22-10
     1-22-10 "N.J. poll finds support for easier teach dismissal, merit pay'
     1-20-10 'N.J. files application for federal Race to the Top education money'
     1-20-10 Editorials, Commentary on New Governor in Trenton
     1-18-10 Advance news on 'Christie as new Governor'
     GSCS to speak at Tri-District 'Open' meeting in Monmouth on January 27
     1-15-10 Education News-Race to the Top incentives, NCLB annual results, supermajority vote upheld
     1-14-10 'N.J. Gov.-elect Christie targets teachers' union with Schundler appointment'
     1-14-10 'To lead schools, Christie picks voucher advocate'
     1-12-10 Lame Duck Session is over
     1-11-10 Transition News
     1-10-10 'Educators say consolidating school districts doesn't add up'
     1-8-10 Of Note for schools - from Lame Duck session yesterday, 1-7-10
     1-6-10 Race to the Top Plans on the move, not without conflict
     1-6-10 Lame Duck Legislative Calendar Updated
     12-31-09 Commissioner invites chief school administrators to Race to the Top meeting
     1-5-10 GSCS: Update on January 4 Lame Duck Session & State School Aid Proposal
     1-5-10 Lame Duck Legislative Calendar through January 12th
     1-5-10 Update on January 4 Lame Duck Session
     12-23-09 Gannett article provides details on Gov. Corzine's proposal to use additional surplus in place of state aid
     12-23-09 GSCS: Governor Corzine targets excess school surplus to replace state aid payments starting in Feb '10 - lame duck legislation anticipated
     1-4-10 Legislative Calendar through January 12th
     1-4-10 Assembly Education Committee Agenda
     12-30-09 January 4th Senate Quorum -Committee Schedule (Assembly not yet public information)
     January 2010 Lame Duck Legislative Schedule
     12-15-09 Also on the GSCS Radar Screen
     12-15-09 On the GSCS Radar Screen: S2850 poised for a vote
     11-17-09 Politickernj's 'Inside Edge' on Possible Education Committee Chairs
     11-19-09 GSCS HEADS UP: Prevailing Wage bills on 'lame duck fast track' to be heard on 11-23-09
     11-13-09 Education Week on: Gov-elect Christie's Education Agenda; Race to the Top Funds Rules
     11-12-09 p.m. Lame Duck Schedule Announced
     10-26-09 'High school sports spending grows as budgets get tighter inNew Jersey'
     10-2009 On the GSCS Radar Screen
     10-1-09 Education Week on Acheivement Gap narrowing; Algebra Testing
     10-1-09 Information on S2850 Prevailing Wage bill - food service workers included
     9-29-09 My Central NJ article on merging v home rule struggle
     GSCS Report on its Annual Meeting June 2009
     9-27-09 Education News of Note
     9-23-09 'Tests changing for special ed students'
     9-13-09 As an issue for N.J.(Gubernatorial election), schools are in'
     8-10-09 News of Note
     8-7-09 'Bill would strengthen teacher tenure rights'
     7-14-09 Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial
     6-26-09 Floor Amendment to A1489 re Extracurricular fees
     6-26-09 Executive Director to GSCS Trustees; Wrap Up Report - State Budget and Assembly bills this week
     6-26-09 Education Issues in the News
     6-23-09 A4141 & S3000 clarifies how to eliminate Non-Operating school districts
     6-23-09 Grassroots at Work re A4140, A4142 and A1489
     6-23-09 Press of Atlantic City on Assembly Education hearing yestserday
     6-22-09 Assembly Education moves bills out of committee
     6-22-09 GSCS Testimony A1489, A4140, A4142
     6-22-09 Bills A4140, 4142, and A1489
     6-21-09 Assembly Education hearing for 6-22 9 am
     6-15-09 GSCS Testifies on its concerns re S2850
     6-11-09 GSCS - it sometimes defies logic
     4-5-09 The Record, Sunday April 5, Front Page Opinion
     4-5-09 A new approach to an old math problem'
     12-28-08 NY Times 'Pension Fight Signals What Lies Ahead'
     12-29-08 NJ to new leaders - Fund our schools
     12-21-08 GSCS EMAILNET - Excerpts
     11-25-08 Perspective piece criticizes recent Supreme Court Abbott decision
     11-24-08 Editorial asks for preschool initiative slow down
     11-23-08 'State lacks financial incentives to sell concept of school mergers'
     11-4-08 NCLB early test results
     10-6-08 D.O.E. October Workshops on Transforming High Schools
     10-6-08 October Workshops on Tranforming High Schools
     GSCS, Special Education Coalition for Funding Reform, and Rutgers Institute co-sponsor Forum Oct 7th
     10-8-08 GSCS spotlights preschool expansion implementation issues as a prioirty
     9-30-08 Senate Education Committee meets 10-2-08
     9-24-08 Editorials re High School Redesign issues
     9-24-08 Commissioner of Education at Assembly Education Committee yesterday
     9-24-08 Supreme Court hearing on constitutionality of School Funding Reform Act
     9-17-08 HIGH SCHOOL 'REDESIGN' PLAN TO BE DISCUSSED AT STATE BOARD OF ED TODAY
     SAVE THE DATE - OCT. 7TH
     6-17-08 School bills passed in Assembly yesterday
     6-13-08 News on Education Committee actions yesterday in Trenton
     4-07 The CORE bill 'A4' in its entirety
     5-15-08 Bills A10 and A15 already posted for a vote in the Assembly this Monday 5-19-08
     9-20-07 New Jersey School Boards Assoc. Releases its Report on Special Education
     9-20-07 With eyes on the future, justices look back at Abbott
     7-31-07 EMAILNET Status of School Funding Formula, more
     Public Education Institute Forum 9-19-07
     Recent education Research articles of note from Public Educ Network
     APRIL '07 MOODY's OUTLOOK ON SCHOOLS -NEGATIVE
     8-9-06 Special Session Jt Comm on Consolidation of Govt Services meeting 8-8-06
     8-2-06 Special Session 4 committees description
     8-2-06 Legislature's descriptoin of Jt Comm on School Funding Reform
     7--31-06 Legislature appoints Joint Committees on Property Tax Reform
     7-29-06 School Funding formula draws mixed reactions
     7-28-06 Gov to legislature: make history, cut taxes
     7-27-06 Trenton begins its move to address property taxes
     7-25-06 Associated Press Prop Tax Q & A
     7-19-06 Ledger -Advocates sue for release of report on school funding
     7-16-06 (thru 7-21-06) Bergen Record series investigate cost of NJ public services & property tax link
     7-18-06 Live from the Ledger
     7-18-06 Education Law Center takes state to court over funding study
     7-18-07 Star Ledger on high taxes & quality education in one town
     7-16-06 Bergen Record series investigate cost of NJ public services & property tax link
     7-14-06 EMAILNET
     7-13-06 Articles - Property tax issues, teacher salaries, voucher suit filing
     7-12-06 Statehouse starts talking specifics about property tax reform
     7-11-06 Talk of Special Session on Property Tax Reform
     6-15-06 Star Ledger, Gannet articles- Abbott advocates demand school reform at educ. dept
     A54 Roberts - Revises title and duties of county supterintendent
     Status of Senate bills related to SCI report
     6-12-06 EMAILNET - Extraordinary Special Education student aid; FY07 Budget 'crunch' is on; news clips
     6-6-06 Legislative Leaders announce initial plans for property tax reform
     S1546 Moves School Elections - GSCS Position
     Representative GSCSTestimonies
     Funding Coalition submits paper 'Beginning Discussions on School Funding Reform'
     Find Your Legislator
     5-14-06N Y Times 'For school budgets the new word is NO'
     Assembly Speaker Roberts proposes 'CORE' plan for schools & towns
     AR168 WatsonColeman-Stanley
     5-16-06 EMAILNET Action in Trenton
     5-10-06 A Lot is going on - Major News fromTrenton
     5-9-06 Supreme Ct freezes aid & Asm Budget Comm grills DOE Commissioner
     4-21-06 School budget election fallout - politicians & press comment
     3-28-06 GSCS testimony before Assembly Budget Comm today
     4-17-06 EMAILNET
     4-8-07 Corzine Administration files brief with Supreme Court re Abbott funding
     4-16-06 Star Ledger editorial & article re Gov v. Abbott from 4-15-06
     3-28-06 GSCS testimony before Assembly Budget Comm
     Legislative Calendar during State Budget FY07 process
     3-24-06 Schools learn who wins, loses in Corzine budget
     3-10-06 Star Ledger 'Time is ripe for poorer districts to contribute.
     2-22-06 New York Times NCLB - 20 states ask for flexibility
     2-1-06 EMAILNET GSCS Advocacy FY07 Budget; On the Homepage Today
     Governor Corzine's Transition Team Reports
     1-25-06 Star Ledger 'School District's Woes Point to Rising Tax Resistance'
     1-19-06 EMAILNET Quick Facts, On the Homepage Today
     The Record7-10-05 Sunday Front Page Must Read
     GSCS submission to Governor Corzine's Education Policy Transiton Team
     1-15-06 The Record 2 Sunday Articles anticipating top issues confronting the Corzine administration
     1-15-06 Sunday Star Ledger front page on Property Taxes
     1-12-06 Star Ledger 'Lawmaker pushes tax relief plan'
     12-14-05 Asbury ParkPress Editorial 'Re-assess the ABC's of School Funding' notes the Governor's role is critical in making positive change occur
     Star Ledger 6-17-06 Seniors call for Tax Convention Senate Prefers Special Session
     Activists Hope to Revive School Funding Issue
     December 2005 Harvard Famiily Research Project Links
     12-5-05 Governor-elect Corzine selects policy advisory groups
     EMAILNET 12-3-05 Heads Up!
     YOU ARE INVITED - GSCS Invitation: Members and friends of education are invited to a December 7 Symposium on School Funding 'It's Time to get off the Dime - Pitfalls, Priorities and Potential'
     10-19-05 Courier Post-Gannett article on Gubernatorial Debate
     11-1-05 EMAILNET More information on Gubernatorial Candidates
     Lameduck Legislative Calendar November 10 2005 - January 9, 2006
     11-9-05 8 a.m. Election November 8 2005 information
     11-8-05 EMAILNET You are invited to Dec & Symposium on School Funding
     10-14-05 EMAILNET Parent question for Gubernatorial Candidates aired on 101.5 debate, SCC funds, Next Board meeting, press briefing notes
     November 8 2005 YOUR VOTE TODAY COUNTS ... Some news articles worth reading
     Education Law Center Issues Guildlines for Abbot School Districts
     10-16-05 Sunday Star Ledger & Gannet news articles on gubernatorial candidates take on important issues related to public education issues
     10-5-05 PRESS BRIEFING ON SCHOOL AID & FUNDING SPONSORED by Ad Hoc School Finance Discussion Group, GSCS is participant...10-6-05 ASbury Park Press (Gannett) & Press of Atlantic City articles
     Proposed State Budget for Fiscal Year 2006 - GSCS Testimony
     GSCS Testimony before Constitutional Convention Task Force
     NCLB
6-21-09 Assembly Education hearing for 6-22 9 am
June 21 Sunday: The committee meeting was not on the schedule until late Friday after business hours. Legislation to be heard just emerging. Assembly Education Monday, June 22, 2009 - 9:00 AM Meeting - Committee Room 11, 4th Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ A-4140, concerning collective bargaining agreements and subcontracting, A-4141, clarifying the procedure for the elimination of non-operating school districts, and A-4142, concerning certain disciplinary procedures, collective bargaining, and binding arbitration in public employment, are on the agenda pending introduction & referral.Assembly Education Monday, June 22, 2009 - 9:00 AM Meeting - Committee Room 11, 4th Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ A-4140, concerning collective bargaining agreements and subcontracting, A-4141, clarifying the procedure for the elimination of non-operating school districts, and A-4142, concerning certain disciplinary procedures, collective bargaining, and binding arbitration in public employment, are on the agenda pending introduction & referral. A-1489 Prohibits boards of education from charging students a fee to participate in extracurricular activities.

(All above – “This act shall take effect immediately.”)

GSCS Positions on A4140, A1489, A4142: OPPOSED. Legislation & GSCS Position Statement - attached.

June 21 Sunday: These bills only surfaced late yesterday/Saturday. The committee meeting wasn't on the schedule until late Friday after business hours; the bills/drafts not available for review until Sunday.

 
 
 

 

 

Assembly Education

    Monday, June 22, 2009 - 9:00 AM

    Meeting - Committee Room 11, 4th Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ

A-4140, concerning collective bargaining agreements and subcontracting, A-4141, clarifying the procedure for the elimination of non-operating school districts, and A-4142, concerning certain disciplinary procedures, collective bargaining,  and binding arbitration in public employment, are on the agenda pending introduction & referral.

A-1489 Prohibits boards of education from charging students a fee to participate in extracurricular activities.

 

(All above - This act shall take effect immediately.)

    

     


 

PROPOSED A4140:

An Act concerning certain collective bargaining agreements and subcontracting and supplementing P.L.1941, c.100 (C.34:13A-1 et seq.).

 

This act shall take effect immediately.

                Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

                1.            As used in this act:

                “Employee” means any employee, whether employed on a full or part-time basis, of an employer.

                “Employer” means any: local or regional school district; county vocational school district; county special services school district; jointure commission; educational services commission; school district under partial or full State intervention, charter school; county college, State college, college or university under the authority of the Commission on Higher Education; or board or commission under the authority of the Commissioner of Education or the State Board of Education.

                “Subcontracting” means any action, practice, or effort by an employer which results in any services or work performed by any of its employees being performed or provided by any other person, vendor, corporation, partnership, or entity.

                “Subcontracting agreement” means any agreement or arrangement entered into by an employer to implement subcontracting, but shall not include any shared services agreement entered into pursuant to the “Uniform Shared Services and Consolidation Act,” P.L.2007, c.63 (C.40A:65-1 et seq.), or any contract to provide services to nonpublic schools through State or federal funds, or any contract in which it is required by law that workers be paid the prevailing wage determined by the Commissioner of Labor and Workforce Development pursuant to the provisions of the “New Jersey Prevailing Wage Act,” P.L.1963, c.150 (C.34:11-56.25 et seq.).

                2.            Except for actions of an employer expressly required or prohibited by the provisions of P.L.1941, c.100 (C.34:13A-1 et seq.), all aspects of and actions relating to or resulting from an employer’s decision to subcontract including, but not limited to, whether or not severance pay is provided, shall be mandatory subjects of negotiations.

                3.            No employer shall enter into a subcontracting agreement which involves or affects the bargaining unit work performed by the members of a bargaining unit covered by a collective bargaining agreement with the majority representative while that agreement, or a successor agreement, is in effect. No employer shall enter into a subcontracting agreement for a period following the term of such a collective bargaining agreement or successor agreement unless the employer:

                a.            Provides written notice to the majority representative of each collective bargaining unit which may be affected by the subcontracting agreement and to the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission, not less than 90 days before the employer requests bids, or solicits contractual proposals for the subcontracting agreement; and

                b.            Has offered the majority representative of each collective bargaining unit which may be affected by the subcontracting agreement the opportunity to meet and consult with the employer to discuss the decision to subcontract, and the opportunity to engage in negotiations over the impact of the subcontracting. The employer’s duty to negotiate with the majority representatives of the affected bargaining units shall not preclude the employer’s right to subcontract upon the expiration of any existing collective agreement or the expiration of a successor agreement, provided that the employer has provided the majority representative of the members of the bargaining unit with the information required by subsection d. of section 4 of this act and provided at least 90 days for the majority representative to engage in the process provided by this section.

                4.            In addition to the requirements of section 3 of this act, no employer covered by this act shall enter a subcontracting agreement unless the other person, vendor, corporation, partnership, or entity which will provide the services included in the subcontracting agreement submits a bid or proposal which includes but is not limited to the following information:

                a.            Evidence of liability insurance in scope and amount equivalent to the liability insurance that the employer maintains to cover its liability for personal injury claims made against it;

                b.            A list of the number of employees who will provide the subcontracted services, the job classifications of those employees, and the wages the third party will pay those employees;

                c.             A minimum three-year cost projection, using generally accepted accounting principles, and which the third party is prohibited from increasing if the bid or proposal is accepted by the employer, for each and every expenditure category and account for performing the subcontracted services;

                d.            Composite information about the criminal and disciplinary records, including alcohol or other substance abuse, Department of Children and Families complaints and investigations, traffic violations, and license revocation or any other licensure problem, of any employees who may perform the services, provided that the individual names and other identifying information of employees need not be provided with the submission of the bid, but must be made available upon request of the employer; and

                e.            An affidavit, notarized by the president or chief executive officer of the third party, that each of its employees has completed a criminal background check as required by section 1 of P.L.1986, c.116 (C.18A:6-7.1) three months prior to submission of the bid, provided that the results of such background checks need not be provided with the submission of the bid, but must be made available upon request of the employer.

                5.            Each employee replaced or displaced as the result of a subcontracting agreement shall retain all previously acquired seniority during that period and shall have recall rights whenever the subcontracting terminates.

                6.            An employer who violates any provision of this act shall be deemed to have committed an unfair practice, and any majority representative organization affected by the violation may file an unfair practice charge with the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission.  If the organization prevails on the charge, the commission may provide a remedy including, but not limited to, reinstatement, back pay, back benefits, back emoluments, tenure and seniority credit, and any other relief that the commission deems appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this act.

                7.            Nothing in this act shall be construed as authorizing subcontracting which is not otherwise authorized by law.  Nothing in this act shall be construed as restricting or limiting any right established or provided for employees by section 7 of P.L.1968, c.303 (C.34:13A-5.3).  The purpose of this act is to provide rights in addition to those provided in that section.

                8.This act shall take effect immediately.

STATEMENT

                This bill supplements the “New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act” to prohibit an employer from entering into a subcontracting agreement which may affect the employment of any employees in a collective bargaining unit during the term of a collective bargaining agreement covering those employees.  The bill defines “employer” as any local or regional school district, county vocational school district, county special services school district, jointure commission, educational services commission, school district under partial or full State intervention, charter school, any county college, State college, college or university under the authority of the Commission on Higher Education, or any board or commission under the authority of the Commissioner of Education or the State Board of Education.  The employer is permitted to enter into a subcontracting agreement for a period following the term of a current collecting bargaining agreement only if the employer:

                1.            Provides written notice both to the majority representative of employees and the Public Employment Relations Commission at least 90 days prior to any effort by the employer to seek the subcontracting agreement; and

                2.            Offers the majority representative the opportunity to meet and discuss the decision to subcontract and negotiate over its impact.

                The bill requires the disclosure of various information regarding the subcontractor including proof of required insurance, a cost projection of at least three years, and criminal and disciplinary records and other information about subcontractor employees.

                The bill makes all actions of an employer regarding subcontracting, except for those expressly required or prohibited by the bill, mandatory subjects of negotiations.

                Each employee replaced or displaced because of a  subcontracting agreement is deemed by the bill to be on a leave of absence during the period of the subcontracting and therefore retains all previously acquired seniority and has recall rights when the subcontracting terminates.

                The bill provides that an employer who violates its provisions has committed an unfair practice, and may be subject to unfair practice charge with the Public Employment Relations Commission, under which the employee may be entitled to remedies including reinstatement, back pay, back benefits, back emoluments, tenure and seniority credit, and attorney's fees.

                                

Concerns collective bargaining agreements and subcontracting.

 

PROPOSED A4142:

An Act concerning certain disciplinary procedures, collective bargaining, and binding arbitration, and amending P.L.1968, c.303 and P.L.1989, c.269.

 

This act shall take effect immediately.

                Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

                1.            Section 1 of P.L.1968, c.303 (C.34:13A-5.3) is amended to read as follows:

                1.            Except as hereinafter provided, public employees shall have, and shall be protected in the exercise of, the right, freely and without fear of penalty or reprisal, to form, join and assist any employee organization or to refrain from any such activity; provided, however, that this right shall not extend to elected officials, members of boards and commissions, managerial executives, or confidential employees, except in a school district the term managerial executive shall mean the superintendent of schools or his equivalent, nor, except where established practice, prior agreement or special circumstances dictate the contrary, shall any supervisor having the power to hire, discharge, discipline, or to effectively recommend the same, have the right to be represented in collective negotiations by an employee organization that admits nonsupervisory personnel to membership, and the fact that any organization has such supervisory employees as members shall not deny the right of that organization to represent the appropriate unit in collective negotiations; and provided further, that, except where established practice, prior agreement, or special circumstances dictate the contrary, no policeman shall have the right to join an employee organization that admits employees other than policemen to membership.  The negotiating unit shall be defined with due regard for the community of interest among the employees concerned, but the commission shall not intervene in matters of recognition and unit definition except in the event of a dispute.

                Representatives designated or selected by public employees for the purposes of collective negotiation by the majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for such purposes, by the majority of the employees voting in an election conducted by the commission as authorized by this act or, at the option of the representative in a case in which the commission finds that only one representative is seeking to be the majority representative, by a majority of the employees in the unit signing authorization cards indicating their preference for that representative, shall be the exclusive representatives for collective negotiation concerning the terms and conditions of employment of the employees in such unit.  An authorization card indicating preference shall not be valid unless it is printed in a language understood by the employees who signs it.

                Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent any official from meeting with an employee organization for the purpose of hearing the views and requests of its members in such unit so long as (a) the majority representative is informed of the meeting; (b) any changes or modifications in terms and conditions of employment are made only through negotiation with the majority representative; and (c) a minority organization shall not present or process grievances.  Nothing herein shall be construed to deny to any individual employee his rights under Civil Service laws or regulations.  When no majority representative has been selected as the bargaining agent for the unit of which an individual employee is a part, he may present his own grievance either personally or through an appropriate representative or an organization of which he is a member and have such grievance adjusted.

                A majority representative of public employees in an appropriate unit shall be entitled to act for and to negotiate agreements covering all employees in the unit and shall be responsible for representing the interest of all such employees without discrimination and without regard to employee organization membership.  Proposed new rules or modifications of existing rules governing working conditions shall be negotiated with the majority representative before they are established. In addition, the majority representative and designated representatives of the public employer shall meet at reasonable times and negotiate in good faith with respect to grievances, disciplinary disputes, and other terms and conditions of employment.  Nothing herein shall be construed as permitting negotiation of the standards or criteria for employee performance.

                When an agreement is reached on the terms and conditions of employment, it shall be embodied in writing and signed by the authorized representatives of the public employer and the majority representative.  In all cases, the terms of a collectively negotiated agreement shall supersede the terms of any individual contract between a public employer and an individual public employee whose position is within the bargaining unit covered by the collective agreement.  No term or provision in such an individual contract may be applied or interpreted in a manner which limits, restricts, or circumscribes, or has the effect of limiting, restricting, or circumscribing a provision or right contained within the collective agreement.

                Public employers shall negotiate written policies setting forth grievance and disciplinary review procedures by means of which their employees or representatives of employees may appeal the interpretation, application or violation of policies, agreements, and administrative decisions, including disciplinary determinations, affecting them, provided that such grievance and disciplinary review procedures shall be included in any agreement entered into between the public employer and the representative organization.  Such grievance and disciplinary review procedures may provide for binding arbitration as a means for resolving disputes, except that binding arbitration shall be the statutorily required terminal step for all disciplinary review procedures in all collective agreements between employers and employees subject to the provisions of P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.).  Except as otherwise provided herein, and except as provided in P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.), the procedures agreed to by the parties may not replace or be inconsistent with any alternate statutory appeal procedure nor may they provide for binding arbitration of disputes involving the [discipline] termination or discharge of employees [with] who have achieved statutory tenure or who have statutory protection under [tenure or] the civil service laws[, except that].  Except as otherwise required by P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.), such procedures may provide for binding arbitration of disputes involving the minor discipline of any public employees protected under the provisions of section 7 of P.L.1968, c.303 (C.34:13A-5.3), other than public employees subject to discipline pursuant to R.S.53:1-10.  Grievance and disciplinary review procedures established by agreement between the public employer and the representative organization shall be utilized for any dispute covered by the terms of such agreement.  [For the purposes of this section] Except as otherwise required by P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.), minor discipline shall mean a suspension or fine of less than five days unless the employee has been suspended or fined an aggregate of 15 or more days or received more than three suspensions or fines of five days or less in one calendar year.

                Where the State of New Jersey and the majority representative have agreed to a disciplinary review procedure that provides for binding arbitration of disputes involving the major discipline of any public employee protected under the provisions of this section, other than public employees subject to discipline pursuant to R.S.53:1-10, the grievance and disciplinary review procedures established by agreement between the State of New Jersey and the majority representative shall be utilized for any dispute covered by the terms of such agreement. For the purposes of this section, major discipline shall mean a removal, disciplinary demotion, suspension or fine of more than five days, or less where the aggregate number of days suspended or fined in any one calendar year is 15 or more days or unless the employee received more than three suspensions or fines of five days or less in one calendar year.

                In interpreting the meaning and extent of a provision of a collective negotiation agreement providing for grievance arbitration, a court or agency shall be bound by a presumption in favor of arbitration.  Doubts as to the scope of an arbitration clause shall be resolved in favor of requiring arbitration.

(cf: P.L.2005, c.380)

                2.            Section 1 of P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22) is amended to read as follows:

                1.            As used in [this act] P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.):

                "Commission" means the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission.

                "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of Education.

                "Discipline" includes all forms of discipline[,] including, but not limited to: all forms of discharge, termination and contract nonrenewal, whether effective during or at the end of an individual employment contract or under any other circumstances, affecting any and all employees who have not yet obtained statutory tenure or permanent civil service status, or who are in positions which are not eligible for statutory tenure or permanent civil service status; the withholding for any reason of salary increments pursuant to N.J.S.18A:29-14; and any and all forms of reprimands, fines and suspensions; except that “discipline” does not include: tenure charges filed pursuant to the provisions of subsubarticle 2 of subarticle B of Article 2 of chapter 6 of Subtitle 3 of Title 18A of the New Jersey Statutes, N.J.S.18A:6-10 et seq.[, or the withholding of increments pursuant to N.J.S.18A:29-14]; reductions in force implemented pursuant to N.J.S.18A:28-9; or suspensions with pay pursuant to section 1 of P.L.1971, c.435 (C.18A:6-8.3) or N.J.S.18A:25-6.

                "Employees" means employees of an employer as defined by this act.

                 "Employer" means any county college, local or regional school district, educational services commission, jointure commission, county special services school district, county vocational school district, charter school or board or commission under the authority of the commissioner or the State Board of Education.

                 "Extracurricular activities" include those activities or assignments not specified as part of the teaching and duty assignments scheduled in the regular work day, work week, or work year.

                ["Minor discipline" includes, but is not limited to, various forms of fines and suspensions, but does not include tenure charges filed pursuant to the provisions of subsubarticle 2 of subarticle B of Article 2 of chapter 6 of Subtitle 3 of Title 18A of the New Jersey Statutes, N.J.S.18A:6-10 et seq., or the withholding of increments pursuant to N.J.S.18A:29-14, letters of reprimand, or suspensions with pay pursuant to section 1 of P.L. 1971, c. 435 (C.18A:6-8.3) and N.J.S. 18A:25-6.]

                "Regular work day, work week, or work year" means that period of time that all members of the bargaining unit are required to be present and at work.

                "Teaching staff member" means a member of the professional staff of any employer holding office, position or employment of such character that the qualifications, for the office, position or employment, require him to hold a valid and effective standard, provisional or emergency certificate, appropriate to that office, position or employment, issued by the State Board of Examiners.  "Teaching staff member" includes a school nurse.

(cf: P.L.1989, c.269, s.1)

                3.            Section 3 of P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-24) is amended to read as follows:

                3. a.  Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, and if negotiated with the majority representative of the employees in the appropriate collective bargaining unit, an employer shall have the authority to impose [minor] discipline on employees.  Nothing contained herein shall limit the authority of the employer to impose, in the absence of a negotiated agreement regarding [minor] discipline, any disciplinary sanction which is authorized and not prohibited by law.  Any imposition of discipline upon an employee covered by P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.), shall be subject to review pursuant to the applicable collectively negotiated grievance procedure, including mandatory binding arbitration pursuant to section 8 of P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-29).

                b.            The scope of [such] negotiations shall include a schedule setting forth the acts and omissions for which [minor] discipline may be imposed, and also the penalty to be imposed for any act or omission warranting imposition of [minor] discipline.

                c.             Fines and suspensions for [minor] discipline which are specified in a negotiated agreement or result from an arbitrator’s award shall not constitute a reduction in compensation pursuant to the provisions of N.J.S.18A:6-10.

(cf: P.L.1989, c.269, s.3)

                4.            Section 5 of P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-26) is amended to read as follows:

                5.            Disputes involving the withholding of an employee's increment by an employer [for predominately disciplinary reasons] for any reason shall be subject to the contractual grievance procedures established pursuant to law and shall be subject to binding arbitration as required by the provisions of section 8 of this act.

(cf: P.L.1989, c.269, s.5)

                5.            Section 6 of P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-27) is amended to read as follows:

                6. a.  If there is a dispute as to whether a transfer of an employee between work sites [or withholding of an increment of a teaching staff member] is disciplinary, the commission shall determine whether the basis for the transfer [or withholding] is predominately disciplinary.

                b. If the commission determines that the basis for a transfer is predominately disciplinary, the commission shall have the authority to take reasonable action to effectuate the purposes of this act.

                c.  [If the commission determines that the basis for an increment withholding is predominately disciplinary, the dispute shall be resolved through the grievance procedures established pursuant to law and shall be subject to the provisions of section 8 of this act.] (Deleted by amendment, P.L.    , c.   )(now pending before the Legislature as this bill)

                d.  If a dispute involving [the reason for] the withholding of [a teaching staff member's increment is submitted to the commission pursuant to subsection a. of this section, and the commission determines that the reason for the increment withholding relates predominately to the evaluation of a teaching staff member's teaching performance, the teaching staff member] the salary increment of an employee who is not represented by a majority representative arises, the employee may file a petition of appeal with the Commissioner of Education pursuant to N.J.S.18A:6-9 and N.J.S.18A:29-14[, and the petition shall be deemed to be timely if filed within 90 days of notice of the commission's decision, or of the final judicial decision in any appeal from the decision of the commission, whichever date is later].

(cf: P.L.1989, c.269, s.6)

                6.            Section 7 of P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-28) is amended to read as follows:

                7.            Nothing in [this act] P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.) shall be deemed to restrict or limit any right established or provided by section 7 of P.L.1968, c.303 (C.34:13A-5.3); this act shall be construed as providing additional rights in addition to and supplementing the rights provided by that section.

(cf: P.L.1989, c.269, s.7).

                7.            Section 8 of P.L.1989 c.269 (C.34:13A-29) is amended to read as follows:

                8. a.  The grievance procedures that employers covered by [this act] P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.) are required to negotiate pursuant to section 7 of P.L.1968, c.303 (C.34:13A-5.3) shall be deemed to require, by operation of law,  binding arbitration as the terminal step in all collective agreements with respect to disputes concerning imposition of [reprimands and] discipline as that term is defined in [this act] section 1 of P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22).

                b. In any grievance procedure negotiated pursuant to [this act] P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.), the burden of proof shall be on the employer covered by this act seeking to impose discipline as that term is defined in [this act] section 1 of P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22).  In any arbitration regarding the discharge, termination or contract nonrenewal of any employee covered by P.L.1989, c.269 (C.34:13A-22 et seq.), whether effective during or at the end of an individual employment contract or under any other circumstances, excluding the termination of employees who have achieved statutory tenure or permanent civil service status, the arbitrator shall have the discretion to order a remedy including, but not limited to, reinstatement of the grievant with back pay and benefits.

                c. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 18A of the New Jersey Statutes, the “New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act,” P.L.1941, c.100 (C.34:13A-1 et seq.), or any other law or regulation to the contrary, the terms of a collectively negotiated agreement shall supersede the terms of an individual contract between a public employer and an individual public employee whose position is within the bargaining unit covered by the collective agreement.  No term or provision in such an individual contract may be applied or interpreted in a manner which limits, restricts or circumscribes, or has the effect of limiting, restricting or circumscribing a provision or right contained within the collective agreement.

(cf: P.L.1989, c.269, s.8)

                8.            This act shall take effect immediately.

STATEMENT

                This bill provides that the terms of a collectively negotiated agreement shall supersede the terms of any individual contract between any public employer and any individual public employee whose position is within the bargaining unit covered by the collective agreement.  In addition to this provision, which applies to individual contracts of both educational and non-educational public employers and employees, the bill, with respect to only the educational sector:

                1.            Makes binding arbitration the terminal step for the review of any imposition of discipline under collective bargaining agreements, extending that requirement to major, as well as minor, discipline, and extends the scope of collective bargaining to cover procedures for major, as well as minor, discipline.

                2.            Provides that fines and suspensions for any discipline, major as well as minor, levied under a contract or an arbitrator’s award do not constitute a reduction in compensation for pension purposes;

                3.            Extends binding arbitration and contractual grievance procedures to cover disputes over the withholding of increments for any reason, instead of just for predominately disciplinary reasons;

                4.            Provides an arbitrator, in cases of discharge, termination or contract non-renewal, with the authority to order remedies which include reinstatement with back pay and benefits; and

                5.            Amends the definition of "employer" to include county colleges, county vocational school districts, and charter schools.

                                                                                                                

Concerns certain disciplinary procedures, collective bargaining, and binding arbitration in public employment.

 

ASSEMBLY, No. 1489

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

213th LEGISLATURE

 

PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2008 SESSION

1/8/2008 Introduced, Referred to Assembly Education Committee

 SYNOPSIS

     Prohibits boards of education from charging students a fee to participate in extracurricular activities.

This act shall take effect immediately.

 

 CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel

 
An Act concerning student participation in public school district extracurricular activities and supplementing chapter 42 of Title 18A of the New Jersey Statutes.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

     1.  a.  A board of education shall not charge a student, or the student’s parent or legal guardian, a fee to participate in extracurricular activities; except that the board may charge a fee for the reimbursement of costs associated with equipment and supplies necessary to participate in the extracurricular activity if the board provides the parent or guardian with documentation of those costs.

     b.  In the event that a board of education charges a fee for the reimbursement of costs associated with equipment and supplies pursuant to subsection a. of this section, the board shall not exclude from participation in an extracurricular activity any student whose parent or guardian is unable to pay the fee because of financial hardship. In determining financial hardship the criteria shall be the same as the Statewide eligibility standards for free and reduced price meals under the State school lunch program.

 

     2.  This act shall take effect immediately.

STATEMENT

 This bill prohibits a board of education from charging a student, or the student’s parent or legal guardian, a fee to participate in extracurricular activities. The bill, however, allows a board to charge a fee for the reimbursement of costs associated with equipment and supplies necessary to participate in the extracurricular activity if the board provides the parent or guardian with documentation of those costs. However, a board that charges such a fee may not exclude from participation in extracurricular activities any student whose parent or guardian is unable to pay the fee because of financial hardship. In determining financial hardship under the bill the criteria would be the same as the Statewide eligibility standards for free and reduced price meals under the State school lunch program.

 

 

 

Garden State Coalition of Schools/GSCS

Lynne Strickland, Executive Director

www.gscschools.org

Assembly Education Committee June 21, 2009

GSCS Positions on A4140, A1489, A4142: Opposed

A-4140, concerning collective bargaining agreements and subcontracting,

A-4142, concerning certain disciplinary procedures, collective bargaining,  and binding arbitration in public employment, are on the agenda pending introduction & referral.

A-1489 prohibits boards of education from charging students a fee to participate in extracurricular activities.

Due to very late public notice of the hearing, as well as bills not being available for appropriate review and analysis, GSCS is presenting a compilation of thoughts, including member comments (in quotes below)  on bills A4140, A1489, and A4142.

Overall issues with these proposed bills:

  • Timing

                        Lack of transparency; virtually no public notice

                        No vetting allowed by abrupt process; these major bills require in-depth analysis

                        Economic crisis: bills will cost taxpayers more

  • Instability: Current state of the economy precarious and unstable
  • Mixed Message: District cost-saving measures nullified while legislature tells districts they spend too much
  • No fiscal note; costs to local districts and local taxpayers
  • Effective Immediately

Extremely disruptive

Budgets set for the year

  • Credibility at state level will be out-front issue
  • State mandate-State Pay/Council on Local Mandates
  • Too many unanswered questions outstanding
  • Cap issues – Mandates